SP Superior 128GB

  • Obtained from: Amazon
  • Price paid: $10.97
  • Advertised size: 128GB
  • Logical size: 124,383,133,696 bytes
  • Physical size: 124,383,133,696 bytes
  • Fake/skimpy flash: Skimpy (2.83% skimp)
  • Protected area: 134,217,728 bytes
  • Adjusted skimp: 2.72%
  • Speed class markings: U3, V30, A2
  • CID data:
    • Manufacturer ID: 0x9f
    • OEM ID: 0x5449 (ASCII: TI)
    • Product name: 0x5350434320 (ASCII: SPCC )
    • Product revision: 0x20
Sample #123Average
Serial number0x95990078Not yet testedNot yet testedN/A
Manufacture dateMar 2024Not yet testedNot yet testedN/A
Sequential read speed (MB/sec)90.16Not yet testedNot yet tested90.16
Sequential write speed (MB/sec)30.42Not yet testedNot yet tested30.42
Random read speed (IOPS/sec)2,259.44Not yet testedNot yet tested2,259.44
Random write speed (IOPS/sec)238.91Not yet testedNot yet tested238.91
Read/write cycles to first errorNot yet determinedNot yet testedNot yet testedNot yet determined
Read/write cycles to 0.1% failure thresholdNot yet determinedNot yet testedNot yet testedNot yet determined
Read/write cycles to complete failureNot yet determinedNot yet testedNot yet testedNot yet determined
Total days to complete failureNot yet determinedNot yet testedNot yet testedNot yet determined
Card reader usedJJC CR-UTC4ACNot yet testedNot yet testedN/A
Package frontNot yet testedNot yet testedN/A
Package backNot yet testedNot yet testedN/A
Card frontNot yet testedNot yet testedN/A
Card backNot yet testedNot yet testedN/A

Discussion

After the disappointing results from the SP Elite, I wanted to know if Silicon Power was the issue, if the SP Elite was the issue, or if 3D NAND in general was the issue. To try to narrow down the issue, I picked up these cards and the SP Superior Pro 128GB.

I only have performance results from a single card at the moment…but just based on those results, it looks like this card is going to be slightly better than the SP Elite. Sequential read and random write speeds were similar, while sequential write and random read speeds were improved — about 40% better in sequential write speeds, and about 80% better in random read speeds. In terms of overall performance, this puts it just slightly above average.

Sample #1 is the only one going through endurance testing at the moment, and it has not yet hit the 2,000 read/write cycle mark. It is currently expected to reach this point sometime in January 2025.

Samples #2 and #3 are still in the package waiting to be tested.

November 4, 2024